golden and hyman v. state farm insurance

We affirm the judgment of the intermediate appellate court, but on a different ground. The Court of Special Appeals affirmed, holding, upon reaching the merits of those claims, that the coram nobis court had correctly denied the petition. The Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County, finding Petitioner’s claims to be without merit, denied him coram nobis relief. Both claims concern his asserted ignorance of the duration of his sex offender registration. He presents two claims in support: he was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel before and at the combined plea and sentencing proceeding, and his guilty plea was involuntary. In this matter, his most recent effort, Petitioner has filed his second petition for a writ of coram nobis. Since then, Petitioner has engaged in several efforts to obtain relief from registration. As a result of the conviction, Petitioner was required to register as a sex offender. For that crime, Petitioner received a three-year sentence, fully suspended, with three years of supervised probation. Johnson, Clerk The case before us has its origins in Petitioner Gerald Hyman’s conviction on a plea of guilty to the crime of third degree sexual offense. of the State Government Article) this document is authentic. Filed: Pursuant to Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. STATE OF MARYLAND Barbera, C.J., Greene McDonald Watts Hotten Getty, Adkins, Sally D.

02-K-00-001866 Argued: NovemIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND No. Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County Case No. Petitioner’s failure to raise the issue of the duration of his registration period under the Maryland Sex Offender Registration Act in his 2006 coram nobis petition waived the issue for purposes of his current and potential future petitions.

or in any other proceeding that the petitioner began.” This standard also applies to coram nobis proceedings except inasmuch as, under CP § 8-401, the failure to take a direct appeal does not waive a coram nobis claim. coram nobis proceeding began by the petitioner.

Vol.), renders an allegation of error waived “when a petitioner could have made but intelligently and knowingly failed to make the allegation.

18, September Term, 2018 SEX OFFENDER REGISTRATION – WAIVER IN CORAM NOBIS PROCEEDINGS – The waiver provision of the Uniform Postconviction Procedure Act, Maryland Code, § 7-106 of the Criminal Procedure Article (“CP”) (2001, 2018 Repl.

Golden and hyman v. state farm insurance